Tove Jansson
1972
Around 175 pages
Interesting Facts:
UP NEXT: The Breast by Philip Roth
The Wild Boys
William S. Burroughs
1971
Around 185 pages
Ew.
I guess I should say a bit more than that, but those letters sum up my feelings well. Of course, it's Burroughs so there's not going to be a coherent plot. Just a series of disgusting imagery that still managed to gross me out, even after everything I've seen between the 1001 movie and book Lists.
I guess this is wish fulfillment for some bizarre fantasies Burroughs had, and he's not the first man on our List to drag us on an uncomfortable sexual odyssey involving young boys. He might be the most revolting though.
Skip!
RATING: -----
Interesting Facts:
In 1972, Burroughs wrote a screenplay based on the novel, hoping to have it produced as a hardcore pornographic film, and entered into negotiations with gay porn producer Fred Halsted before abandoning the idea at the end of the year.
UP NEXT: Group Portrait of a Lady by Heinrich Boll
Rabbit Redux
John Updike
1971
Around 410 pages
So The Sea of Fertility is one entry, and yet the Rabbit series is separated by volume. When will these crazy kids decide on a system? Anyway, I happen to adore this series, so the Powers That Be can include it in any manner they see fit.
When we left Harry "Rabbit" Angstrom last, he was struggling. In Rabbit Redux, he is still working a dead end job, still married to the incomparable Janice, and raising their thirteen-year-old son, Nelson. Janice leaves Harry for a sexy Greek guy, so Harry starts a commune, much to the dismay of his conservative neighbors. The commune consists of Skeeter, a Black Vietnam veteran, and Jill, a runaway teenager and heroin addict.
We are now firmly rooted in the 70s, as evidenced by Harry's reaction to his wife leaving. Jill represents something different to Harry, Nelson, and Skeeter. I'm not usually a fan of female characters only being around to help us understand the male characters better, but it admittedly worked well here. None of his characters are particularly admirable, so it's a testament to Updike's writing that he can still manage to make them sympathetic.
He also does a great job moving the plot along, when he could have easily become mired in the psychology of his characters. Looking forward to his next entry on the List.
RATING: ****-
Interesting Facts:
The Guardian ranked it number 88 in a list of the 100 Best Novels.
UP NEXT: The Wild Boys by William Burroughs
The Bluest Eye
Toni Morrison
1970
Around 225 pages
Our first Toni Morrison! She is going to make me feel way too many things. I guess we are starting with inferiority, because this debut novel is incredible and she had no problem finding her voice on the page.
Our story is narrated by nine-year-old Claudia MacTeer, who lives with her sister, parents, a tenant, and Pecola Breedlove, whose house was recently burned down by her abusive father. Pecola wishes for blue eyes, which she sees as a way of achieving the ideal whiteness propagated by her community. I'm not usually the biggest fan of child narrators, but I enjoyed following Pecola's story from a slight distance. And Morrison is realistic in her depictions of children, while still being respectful of their intellect.
Morrison's novels are hard on the soul, so I have to space out my reads. I found this more depressing than I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings, which definitely ends on a more hopeful note. But Morrison did an excellent job representing internalized racism in Pecola, who struggles to reconcile her religious beliefs in an omnipotent god with the reality of living as a minority.
So welcome to the List Toni! I look forward to you kicking me in the feels again and again.
RATING: *****
Interesting Facts:
34th-most banned book in the United States 1990–1999, the 15th-most banned book 2000–2009, and the 10th-most banned book 2010-2019.
UP NEXT: The Ogre by Michel Tournier
A Void
Georges Perec
1969
Around 290 pages
Well, the book cover really gets straight to the point. This is the novel that doesn't use the letter "e." Interestingly, the translators all had to take on this task as well, making modifications based on the rules of their language (for example, the Russian version doesn't use the letter "o" instead).
So I guess that's remarkable. But does anybody actually want to read a book without e's? It seems pointless to follow these characters and their journey, when they are so hopelessly restrained in their speech and actions. The characters are self-aware enough to realize their predicament after awhile, making them feel like they are in a Scream movie. Any gimmick, even if it's brilliantly executed, wears thin after awhile.
It's funny that the loss of letter "e" essentially erases Georges Perec's identity (Amanda would only get stronger in that world). Like Queneau, Perec does a wonderful job with the restrictions he has placed on himself, but that doesn't necessarily make for a compelling read.
RATING: ***--
Interesting Facts:
Translated into over ten languages.
UP NEXT: Them by Joyce Carol Oates